• To: xml-dev@l..., Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>
• Subject: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XMLvision)
• From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi@S...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:57:06 -0800
• In-reply-to: <1045470470.3e509d06a6f80@w...>
• References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030215153127.01122d98@n...><1045470470.3e509d06a6f80@w...>

> I am not so keen on the idea of supporting Relax NG, Schematron, and
> all that stuff. But a simplification of XML Schema would make quite
> some sense

Just out of curiosity, why aren't you interested in supporting other
languages, if you don't think XML Schema makes sense?

regards,
--
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI                  408-276-7063 (x17063)
Sun Microsystems                   kohsuke.kawaguchi@s...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
    • From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>

• References:
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
    • From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Previous by thread: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
• Next by thread: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread