• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:53:01 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACF45@h...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACF45@h...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 02:34 pm, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Then I ask you this question:  can XML namespaces
> be leveraged to help guide an author?  I say it can.
>
> <nikon:lens>
>
> is better than
>
> <lens>

There is an abvious difference here, but how about between

   <nikon:lens/>

and

   <lens manufacturer="Nikon"/>

?

The information content is the same right?

> Assertion (unproven): complexity of content
> and complexity of markup are about the same if one
> drops HTML or other forms of presentation
> markup. 

I'd agree with the assertion, except for all the other factors your brought 
up. Markup design is a compromise between purity and practicality, and the 
balance changes over time.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Next by Date: RE: Remembering the original XML vision
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread