• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 03:02:53 +1100
• References: <1045441502.7668.ezmlm@l...> <1045470470.3e509d06a6f80@w...> <00e701c2d6fd$985e9300$6601a8c0@n...> <094601c2d71a$6e73a770$4bc8a8c0@A...> <004201c2d765$f5405d20$6601a8c0@n...> <006301c2d7d4$ab0deb90$4bc8a8c0@A...> <00b101c2d82a$318ac800$6601a8c0@n...>

From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>


> Correct, the Schematron example is more complex.  For example, you
> didn't include the definition for 'tr' or the definition for 'table'.
> 
> The closest comparable for your snipet:
> <rule context="tr"><assert test="count(td) &lt;="../table/@cols"/></rule>

??? In Schematron we are not defining elements but patterns.
We don't need any definition for table.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
    • From: Jochen Wiedmann <joe@i...>
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
    • From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Next by Date: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
• Previous by thread: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
• Next by thread: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread