• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:24:47 -0500
• In-reply-to: <oprk59i5y1ezizxn@s...>

mc@x... (Mike Champion) writes:
>The question in my mind is do we want these use cases under a big tent
>called "XML" or do we want to encourage them to fork off.  I realize
>that the "just fork off and take your pollution with you" faction is
>well represented on this list, but remember what happened when XML
>forked off SGML .... the fork-ee took all the mindshare with it.

It's a much bigger tent this time, more minds to share.  Beats eating,
uh, pollution.

--
"Put a fork in him - he's done." - classic snide remark.

Simon St.Laurent
http://simonstl.com  http://monasticxml.com

• References:
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: DOM support in IE vs. NS
• Next by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Next by thread: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread