• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 01:27:52 +1100
• References: <7c.35a8563b.2b7ff77d@a...> <06cb01c2d5b0$d0073990$4bc8a8c0@A...> <3E4FC824.4040208@t...> <15951.61361.478169.191803@m...> <5.2.0.9.0.20030218073745.06b30650@n...>

From: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@d...>

> What would you need to make them happy? How much of this is matter of 
> getting the tools written, as opposed to issues with XML per se?

I don't follow.  My comment was in response to 

> "Fortunately, it turned out that when developers are
> happy, they write lots of software, and that ends up making users
> happy as well."

That there is a lot of potential software I would not dispute.

And certainly not to slag off at XForms.

Cheers
Rick Jellffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: XForms and XPath 1.0 conformance
• Next by Date: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Previous by thread: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread