• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Typing and paranoia
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 11:21:20 +0100
• Cc: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <p04330102ba155c1a0b9f@[192.168.254.4]>
• Organization: Expway
• References: <3DEF8BFF.4030100@t...> <oprgx03bryezizxn@localhost> <p04330102ba155c1a0b9f@[192.168.254.4]>
• Reply-to: robin.berjon@e...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> There is no guarantee that the binary formats exported by one process 
> make sense ton the next, even on the same architecture. I'm confident I 
> can make sense out of XML on both ends. I'm not so sure about binary 
> formats.

I've passed gzip'd data around boxes of different architectures, and I tend to 
be pretty confident I can make sense of it on both sides. There's no reason a 
well defined binary infoset couldn't make anyone confident.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Typing and paranoia
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>

• References:
  • Typing and paranoia
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Typing and paranoia
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Typing and paranoia
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Typing and paranoia
• Next by Date: RE: bohemians, gentry
• Previous by thread: Re: Typing and paranoia
• Next by thread: Re: Typing and paranoia
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread