• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Typing and paranoia
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 09:25:19 -0800
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

I agree with those who feel that some applications of XML work just fine 
without any requirement from ancillary typing machinery, and that such 
machinery shouldn't be compulsory, and XPath/XQuery would be immensely 
better if the basic and schema-dependent parts were cleanly separated.

There's really not too much paranoia-fuel in that complex of issues 
though.  What really scares me is the recurring theme that we ought to 
re-frame XML as a data model and treat the syntax as just one 
serialization.  That makes me seriously paranoid - if somebody promises 
me XML, I want a stream of unicode characters with angle-brackets, not 
some fragile opaque binary kludge which is advertised as having infoset 
semantics  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Typing and paranoia
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: Typing and paranoia
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Typing and paranoia
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Paranoia and Slippery Slopes (was Re: bohemians, gentry)
• Next by Date: Re: overrun with bohemians?
• Previous by thread: RE: Paranoia and Slippery Slopes (was Re: bohemians, gentry)
• Next by thread: Re: Typing and paranoia
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread