• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:26:48 -0500
• In-reply-to: <005601c2a771$dc343ff0$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• References: <E18OrqK-0002Bg-00@b...><oprhmzl3riezizxn@s...> <1040295471.2526.9.camel@ibook><oprhnnssazezizxn@s...><005601c2a771$dc343ff0$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• User-agent: Opera7.0/Win32 M2 BETA2 build 2577

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 02:18:18 +1100, Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...> 
wrote:


> Do these applications whose actual practise seems to implicitly deprecate 
> much also seem to implicitly recommend what people should use as an 
> alternative? If they don't have a replacement, those applications may 
> seem to be full of implicit irrelevance.

I'm not sure if that's a question or an all-too-true commentary on my 
turgid prose :-)
But we're essentially talking about SOAP here, and I don't think that's 
irrelevant.

• References:
  • Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
• Next by Date: Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Internal entities removed from XML?
• Next by thread: xpointer() scheme working draft published
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread