• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Using XLink, XPointer
• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:22:28 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1022-CEAB6FC1079E11D7B6E70003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>; from simonstl@s... on Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:41:08AM -0500
• References: <r01050400-1022-4E976BA9079A11D7B6E70003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> <r01050400-1022-CEAB6FC1079E11D7B6E70003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Reply-to: veillard@r...
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:41:08AM -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent) writes:
> >I'm aware that recent versions of Mozilla and Netscape support simple
> >XLinks, that Opera can be taught to support simple XLinks through CSS,
> >and that RDDL, SVG, and MathML use XLink to varying degrees.
> 
> Forgot XML Topic Maps (XTM) in that list, as well as the implementation
> of XPointer in Daniel Veillard's libxml library.

  If I believe bug reports I got :-) the XPointer layer is being used
to select subpart of documents for XInclude. Admitedly it's not directly
related to rendering of the document, i.e. inclusion and not transclusion.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • Using XLink, XPointer
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Using XLink, XPointer
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Using XLink, XPointer
• Next by Date: bohemians, gentry
• Previous by thread: Re: Using XLink, XPointer
• Next by thread: Re: Using XLink, XPointer
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread