• To: roger.day@g...
• Subject: Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 06:23:56 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: danny666@v... (Danny Ayers), donpark@d..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <80256C76.003AF18F.00@n...> from "roger.day@g..." at Nov 19, 2002 10:43:47 AM

roger.day@g... scripsit:

> the only app I've seen using RDF is Mozilla, but I lead a sheltered life. Can
> you cite me some others, please?

dmoz.org.

All the RSS 1.0 feeds out there.

Reuters Health.

-- 
John Cowan       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        <jcowan@r...>
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

• References:
  • RE: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
    • From: roger.day@g...

• Prev by Date: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by Date: RE: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
• Previous by thread: RE: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
• Next by thread: RE: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread