• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:24:35 +1100
• References: <142.2fcb4de.2b0b6362@a...>

From: <AndrewWatt2000@a...>
 
> What are the characteristics of XHTML 2.0 that make you conclude that XHTML 
> 2.0 is an appropriate way forward?
 
I am not an XHTML 2.0 boffin, but is Andrew really asking "Why would we want
a plurality of markup languages in the same area?" 

My answer to that would be that, ultimately, people have different personalities
and different tools. Some people like Python, some people like Java. 

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
    • From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>

• References:
  • What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: RE: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is hard )
• Next by Date: Re: The perils of P18S (was Re: Why RDF is
• Previous by thread: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by thread: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread