Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

To: clbullar@i..., xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:30:28 EST

In a message dated 20/11/2002 16:43:15 GMT Standard Time, clbullar@i... writes:

Andrew:

1. Does XHTML 2.0 have a future? Yes. For those who believe in and
want to pursue development of the Universal Interface Virtual Machine (UIVM)
as Paul calls it, a native language for that machine is needed.

Len,

Is
http://www.blogstream.com/pauls/1034787029
the fullest development of that idea?

Although it seems to have been less than obvious to a few on this list I am actually trying to explore what I see as a serious issue.

Andrew Watt
"XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its full potential ... to implement yesterday's technology tomorrow"

Prev by Date: Re: Universal Applications, Universal Data
Next by Date: canonical xml
Previous by thread: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
Next by thread: RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >