• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: is XML complete?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:16:21 -0800
• Thread-index: AcKFx3/d7+ndxoQdT2izxRjy7asTIAAAF5jQ
• Thread-topic: is XML complete?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:05 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
>
> >> XML Schema, so far as I can tell, has exhausted its 
> participants and 
> >> I haven't heard much talk on that front.
> >> Critics seem to have moved elsewhere, and supporters occasionally 
> >> talk about trimming it, but there's not much activity there.
> >
> >You aren't looking hard enough then. 
> 
> There's plenty of activity in applying W3C XML Schema - 
> that's not what I was talking about.  
> 
> Has a 2.0 suicide mission been chartered?  That would 
> certainly be interesting, but I can't say I've heard a peep about it.
 
1.1 is supposed to show up Real Soon Now (tm) and the WG seems to act
like doing a 2.0 is a given. 


-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Never make anything simple and efficient when a way can be found to make
it complex and wonderful.                 

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: is XML complete?
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • RE: is XML complete?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: is XML complete?
• Next by Date: RE: is XML complete?
• Previous by thread: RE: is XML complete?
• Next by thread: RE: is XML complete?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread