• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: is XML complete?
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 14:15:21 -0500
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1021-D696C1B2F1B711D6870B0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

11/6/2002 1:44:53 PM, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> wrote:


>
>I suspect that line is appropriate for this case, but I'm not sure that
>churning out ever more specs is a good way to keep "busy being born".

If Bob was a nerd and writing the song today, he might have said
"Who's not busy refactoring... Is busy being deprecated."

• References:
  • Re: is XML complete?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: is XML complete?
• Next by Date: RE: is XML complete?
• Previous by thread: Re: is XML complete?
• Next by thread: Re: is XML complete?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread