• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: Re: canonical xml
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:59:30 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Organization: Expway
• References: <5BA3B65DED5F18459100E94091271F93FAD1DD@bby1exm01> <3DDBD985.2080305@d...>
• Reply-to: robin.berjon@e...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Rich Salz wrote:
> UDDI/XSD-C14N will probably be as succesful as the rest of UDDI

I'm not sure that XSD-C14N (usually known as SCC14N) will be that tied to UDDI. 
It is rather useful whenever one needs some form of C14N (usually for security 
reasons) when writing out PSVI data. For instance an attribute of type xs:float 
which has a lexical value of "1.0" in the original document might not round-trip 
to "1.0", therefore it's useful to know whether or not there has been a loss in 
the middle, or if "0.99...6" is ok.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• References:
  • canonical xml
    • From: Jon Steeves <Jon_Steeves@p...>
  • Re: canonical xml
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Universal Applications, Universal Data
• Next by Date: ANN: Open XPath NG mailing list
• Previous by thread: Re: canonical xml
• Next by thread: Re: canonical xml
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread