• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 16:47:39 -0500
• Cc: davidc@n... (David Carlisle),xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200211011518.KAA10941@m...>
• References: <4.3.1.2.20021101084950.0123fc10@m...>

At 10:04 AM 11/1/2002 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
>Ann Navarro scripsit:
>
> > Yes. But unfortunately, it looks like they'd like to burn the concept at
> > the stake.
>
>We have come out in *support* of uniform entity name/character mappings
>across all standards.  We don't think that it's in our charter to do this
>ourselves.

That's not what I'm referring to. You may think uniform names are good, but 
I'm hearing/reading that you think it's perfectly acceptable to force 
average document authors to write internal DTD subsets to be able to write 
"Pepsi ™".

It may be aesthetically pleasing on the technical front, but it's a horrid 
solution on the usability front.

Ann
-----
Ann Navarro, WebGeek, Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com

say what? http://www.snorf.net/blog

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• References:
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Next by Date: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Previous by thread: Ending charters (was Re: Character Entities)
• Next by thread: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread