• To: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@i...>, "'Mike Champion'" <mc@x...>, "'Dave Winer'" <dave@u...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:30:22 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF7A1@h...>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] 
>
> Nothing except that it is based on self-assertion, not 
> heresay.

Everything Google indexes is already a self-assertion; Google indexes
what is published. Everything a UDDI registry indexes is a
self-assertion; UDDI indexes what is given to it.

Let's try a gedanken: Suppose Google spiders a UDDI registry - are two
parties less responsible because they went through Google rather than
the UDDI registry?

Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• References:
  • RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
• Next by Date: how HTTP URIs and URI references work (or don't)
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
• Next by thread: Re: Great piece on RSS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread