Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Sam Hunting scripsit:
> <counter-troll> The phrase <troll> XML is a <phrase>data model</phrase>,
> the syntax in the XML 1.0 REC is just an annoying inconvenience.
> </troll>
> does not appear in XML 1.0, therefore XML has no data model whatever,
> since the Infoset isn't one and doesn't claim to be.</countertroll>
<fishing locus="bridge">
Say rather that XML has no *unique authoritative* data model whatever,
since the Infoset isn't one and doesn't claim to be. But why should there
be such a thing? XML has many data models for different purposes.
The Infoset provides a common terminology into which they can be translated.
</fishing>
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan jcowan@r...
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan
|
