• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• From: Sam Hunting <shunting@e...>
• Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:44:03 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>, Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>, "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A972FE@r...>

<counter-troll> The phrase <troll> XML is a <phrase>data model</phrase>,
the syntax in the XML 1.0 REC is just an annoying inconvenience.  
</troll>
does not appear in XML 1.0, therefore XML has no data model whatever,
since the Infoset isn't one and doesn't claim to be.</countertroll>



Sam Hunting
eTopicality, Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Turn your searching experience into a finding experience."(tm)

Topic map consulting and training: www.etopicality.com
Free open source topic map tools:  www.gooseworks.org

XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web.
Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-74960-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • RE: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Previous by thread: RE: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Next by thread: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread