• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Subject: Re: XML 1.1 documents
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:10:08 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1021-33D17B3AE61D11D688F20003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Oct 22, 2002 08:20:14 PM

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> If no one's done this yet, it might be a good time to set up a simple
> repository.  Is anyone interested in such a project?  I can host files
> at simonstl.com, SourceForge might be an option, or maybe the W3C is
> already working on something like this and hasn't yet published it (or I
> haven't found it.)

They aren't, or at least the Core WG isn't doing so officially.  Some
individual member may be doing so, but if so I haven't heard about it.

-- 
John Cowan                                jcowan@r...
At times of peril or dubitation,          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Perform swift circular ambulation,        http://www.reutershealth.com
With loud and high-pitched ululation.

• References:
  • XML 1.1 documents
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML as "passive data" (Re: The Browser Warsare Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!)
• Next by Date: Re: XML as "passive data" (Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!)
• Previous by thread: XML 1.1 documents
• Next by thread: R: Comparison between SAX parser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread