Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I need both:Speed and validation!But I need also documentation and reliability... maybe I'm asking the moon :-), but someone can help me to arrive closer (to the moon)! Thank you and best -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Karl Waclawek [mailto:karl@w...] Inviato: martedì 22 ottobre 2002 17.05 A: Enrico Prosperi; xml-dev@l... Oggetto: Re: Comparison between SAX parser What are your needs? Speed? Validation? For speed SAXinC++ (based on Expat) is likely one of the best choices, but it does not validate. Karl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Enrico Prosperi" <enrico.prosperi@a...> To: <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:49 AM Subject: Comparison between SAX parser Dear Sirs, I need to develop a C++ application that will use a SAX parser. I have seen that there are a lot of implementation of SAX Parser (SAXinC++, Xerces. MicrosoftSAX, Oracle, etc...). Is there anyone that can help me to decide what is the best (loking at performance, documentation, stability etc...). I'll develop for win32. Any suggest will be very appreciate! If anyone knows other implementations that I didn't mention, please tell me! Thank you in advance and Best Regards Enrico Prosperi ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
