• To: Berend de Boer <berend@x...>
• Subject: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• From: tblanchard@m...
• Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:38:57 +0200
• Cc: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3DB44959.6000504@x...>

On Monday, October 21, 2002, at 08:37  PM, Berend de Boer wrote:

> John Cowan wrote:
>
>> Be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you send.
>>
> Eh, what was the name of that language, yeah, that one with the buffer 
> overflows. C, that's the name!

Its not the language - it was the api.  There are perfectly safe apis 
for C.
If we could just get people to use them. :-/

• References:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: Berend de Boer <berend@x...>

• Prev by Date: XML 1.1 and other specs
• Next by Date: RE: Java package for XPath 1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread