• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• From: Berend de Boer <berend@x...>
• Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:37:13 +1300
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200210211027.GAA24283@m...>
• References: <200210211027.GAA24283@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

John Cowan wrote:

>Be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you send.
>
Eh, what was the name of that language, yeah, that one with the buffer 
overflows. C, that's the name!

I think this world would be a better place if we were very conservative 
in what we accept. If you aren't, the generators are sloppy as well, 
because faults are never detected. And if a big vendor makes a fault in 
its generation, you even run the danger of becoming it a standard.

Regards,

Berend. (-:

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: tblanchard@m...
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread