• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll)
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:35:30 +0100
• Cc: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Organization: Expway
• References: <00e001c27f3a$250f36e0$1fc8c8c8@mitchum>
• Reply-to: robin.berjon@e...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote:
> Additionally, having a documentation element would assist debugging of
> XSLT stylesheets. 

I very much doubt that. I could see the use of a debug attribute on the 
root and top-level elements that would condition a xsl:message elements 
within its scope (this can be done, but requires the latter to be nested 
inside xsl:if test='document("")/...' elements, which is clunky).

All the XML Schema documents I've seen make a heavy use of the 
documentation feature there were far more unreadable than their 
undocumented counterparts.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• References:
  • RE: Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll)
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll)
• Next by Date: Re: Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll)
• Previous by thread: RE: Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll)
• Next by thread: help with inline svg explorer
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread