• To: Gert Baudoncq <Gert.Baudoncq@w...>
• Subject: Re: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:16:33 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <8EE431E6CD37C049AEE8361ED5B98AD4127BBB@E...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Gert Baudoncq wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 'It is too bad that the SVG world is so dependent on a single 
> closed-source implementation.'
> 
> Have a look at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/SVG-Implementations.htm8
> There is clearly more then the Adobe SVG viewer.

Nevertheless, I stand by my statement that the SVG world is primarily 
dependent on a single closed-source implementation. If Adobe retracted 
their SVG viewer, the SVG world would be in bad shape for quite a while.

  Paul Prescod

• References:
  • RE: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
    • From: "Gert Baudoncq" <Gert.Baudoncq@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XF orms?)
• Previous by thread: RE: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
• Next by thread: RE: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread