• Subject: Re: Namespaces
• From: Peter Finch <peter@h...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:50:31 +1000
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <3DAD5B3E.9050202@h...>
• References: <3DAD5B3E.9050202@h...> <3DAD6100.6050802@e...> <gvvqqu8mvvnsmogtr82kc6ac5m54b93gp3@4...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021010

Arjun Ray wrote:

> | In a perfect world namespaces would be part of XML
>
> In a perfect world, XML Namespaces would be hanged, drawn, quartered,
> incinerated, encased in lead and buried several thousand feet below the
> ocean floor.

I understand where your coming from, however, since things
like XSLT came along I can really see the use for them and
I think they are pretty cool idea (maybe that puts me in the
minority). I used to work a lot in SGML and it was always a
problem when merging data, you would end up with "myp",
"yourp" and "theothersp". However, I think there should be
some way to clarify external entities as well...
&xsl:stdtemplates; ... :-)

-PF

• References:
  • Namespaces
    • From: Peter Finch <peter@h...>
  • Re: Namespaces
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: Namespaces
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Dynamic selection of Schema
• Next by Date: ANN: Gorille 0.5
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread