• To: Peter Finch <peter@h...>
• Subject: Re: Namespaces
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:52:16 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Organization: Expway
• References: <3DAD5B3E.9050202@h...>
• Reply-to: robin.berjon@e...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Peter Finch wrote:
> I was just reading the XML 1.1 Candidate recommendation and it got me
> thinking about namespaces again.
> 
> Namespaces for XML 1.1 seems to indicate that a QName can only
> contain one ":". However, XML 1.1 and 1.0 allow for multiple
> ":"'s in a Name. Is this correct or is there a conflict here?

There is a conflict. In a perfect world namespaces would be part of XML 
and not a semi-separate spec that introduces a new level of 
well-formedness. But it isn't a perfect world so we have to 
special-case, especially as some people do write documents with no 
namespaces.

> does anyone see any advantages in an ability for a tag to belong
> to multiple namespaces at once? e.g. "<ns1:ns2:head>"...
> Namespaces 1.2 perhaps????

Oh no please no...

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespaces
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • Namespaces
    • From: Peter Finch <peter@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
• Next by Date: Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread