• To: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Subject: Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:28:36 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3D98C0B5.3080208@p...>

On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 02:23 PM, Paul Prescod wrote:

> The solution that preserves the syntactic goodness of HTML and Docbook 
> is to move the link specification for a vocabuulary into a machine 
> readable form. Then the question becomes how to link to it: but this 
> is no more complicated than nor difficult than linking to a schema. We 
> could use RDDL or a special attribute or processing instruction.

Or XLink, and keep it all inline. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
• Next by Date: XML.org Daily News articles
• Previous by thread: Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
• Next by thread: Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread