• To: tbray@t... (Tim Bray)
• Subject: Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:28:02 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• In-reply-to: <DB2AFE51-D4B8-11D6-B95B-0003938E7308@t...> from "Tim Bray" at Sep 30, 2002 02:09:07 PM

Tim Bray scripsit:

> Dammit, I'm still uncomfortable with moving this information from a 
> self-descriptive form in the instance to another resource, and I'm 
> uncomfortable with the notion that "font-family" is at a similar 
> semantic level to "hyperlink".   More thought required. -Tim

It's not "hyperlink", it's "traversable".

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Just Can't Get No REST
• Next by Date: Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
• Previous by thread: Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
• Next by thread: Re: Are hyperlinks presentation or content?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread