• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: limits of the generic
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 01:08:34 +0000
• In-reply-to: <E17vNqp-0006Do-00@m...>
• References: <jeni@j...> of "Sat, 28 Sep 2002 17:18:27 BST." <197177143298.20020928171827@j...> <E17vNqp-0006Do-00@m...>

Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...> wrote:

| At least using generic approaches, I can plug in the details in a modular 
| fashion, as they are called for.

A voice in the wilderness!  It just isn't PC to argue against Sufficient
Ingenuity, Obligatory HighTech and KitchenSink.dll. 

• References:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: namespaces in XML 1.1 - namespace names become *IRI* references
• Next by Date: RE: namespaces in XML 1.1 - namespace names become *IRI* references
• Previous by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by thread: OT: Frank Lloyd Wright (was Re: limits of the generic)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread