• To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: namespaces in XML 1.1 - namespace names become *IRI* references
• From: "m batsis" <mbatsis@n...>
• Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 03:48:55 -0700
• In-reply-to: <005201c26737$98f57300$fe193044@tbp1>
• Organization: Netsmart.gr
• References: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCGEDHFHAA.julian.reschke@g...> <005201c26737$98f57300$fe193044@tbp1>
• Reply-to: mbatsis@h...

On Saturday 28 September 2002 14:40, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
> [Julian Reschke
>
> > How does this affect the value space for the values of namespace
> > declarations?
> >
> > > I agree that as a minimum, this discrepancy should be cleared up, and
> > > at best, the Rec should be aligned with the RFC for URIs.
> >
> > I disagree that it needs to be aligned. IMHO, it is.
>
> Ah, I see. For some reason I was thinking that the value of namespace
> declaration attributes also had to be an NCNAME.  I don't know where I got
> that idea but now I see it was wrong (maybe because IDREFs have to be
> NCNAMES).  

I was thinking about that too, when noticing that xsl's 
exclude-result-prefixes attribute has the same type (NCNames). 

Why isn't there an anyURIs (derived by list from anyURI)?

MAnos

• References:
  • RE: namespaces in XML 1.1 - namespace names become *IRI* references
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
  • Re: namespaces in XML 1.1 - namespace names become *IRI*references
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Datatypes - it's in the contract
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: namespaces in XML 1.1 - namespace names become *IRI*references
• Next by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread