• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: Re: limits of the generic
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:19:50 -0400
• Cc: jcowan@r... (John Cowan),simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent),xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200209272225.SAA01107@m...>
• References: <4.3.1.2.20020927174753.02d42680@m...>

At 06:13 PM 9/27/2002 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>Ann Navarro scripsit:
>
> > Absolutely. Just as valid HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.1, etc, are written without
> > tools today*. Our company standards allow only enhanced editing features
> > like color syntax highlighting and user-defined macros.
>
>If you have such a thing as standards, you are by definition not a Joe/Jane
>Website.

I disagree -- one of my other hats is educating Joe/Jane Websites through 
books and other instructional materials/events. They're taught to do it by 
hand. My sales figures (and those of many others on this list) indicate 
that people are doing it by hand, and in very large numbers.

Ann

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread