• To: ann@w... (Ann Navarro)
• Subject: Re: limits of the generic
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:13:17 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... (John Cowan), simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <4.3.1.2.20020927174753.02d42680@m...> from "Ann Navarro" at Sep 27, 2002 05:54:49 PM

Ann Navarro scripsit:

> Absolutely. Just as valid HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.1, etc, are written without 
> tools today*. Our company standards allow only enhanced editing features 
> like color syntax highlighting and user-defined macros. 

If you have such a thing as standards, you are by definition not a Joe/Jane
Website.

-- 
John Cowan                                <jcowan@r...>     
http://www.reutershealth.com              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Yakka foob mog.  Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork.  Chumble spuzz.
    -- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread