• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 08:03:38 +0100
• In-reply-to: <kjpqougnb2v06d90mps6dcrudkndjl1n0i@4...>
• References: <00a901c2618d$a322b900$0400a8c0@gandalf> <200209220743.34729.miles@m...> <kjpqougnb2v06d90mps6dcrudkndjl1n0i@4...>

Arjun Ray wrote,
> | or processing document fragments.
>
> As in, non-well-formed fragments to begin with?  I'm not sure what
> that has to do with generating output.  In what way could it be
> useful to produce fragments that are not well-formed?

Well formed ... but partial, so not conforming to the overall 
DTD/schema. I suppose you could generate DTDs/schemas for fragments 
from the overall DTD/schema too, but I have to wonder if the game's 
really worth the candle.

Cheers,


Miles

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Next by Date: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Previous by thread: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Next by thread: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread