• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 07:43:34 +0100
• In-reply-to: <m30qou4tt5a7m4b611phlgje7fmnb9llmt@4...>
• References: <00a901c2618d$a322b900$0400a8c0@gandalf> <200209212348.56739.miles@m...> <m30qou4tt5a7m4b611phlgje7fmnb9llmt@4...>

Arjun Ray wrote,
> | Even when there's no (or an evolving) DTD/schema?
>
> No schema?  Sounds like tag soup, then.  All bets are off.

Right, so code generation isn't a complete solution.

There is, after all, a role for generic XML processing. Or consider 
things which amount to much the same thing as there being no DTD/schema 
from a codegen POV: processing documents with multiple schemas (maybe 
an open-ended collection), or processing document fragments.

Cheers,


Miles

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
  • Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Next by Date: Re: Underwhelmed (WAS: XOM micro tutorial)
• Previous by thread: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Next by thread: Re: InnerXml is like printf (WAS: Underwhelmed)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread