• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:49:47 +0100
• Cc: MDubinko@c..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <8f.2263540f.2aba44ea@a...>
• Organization: Jeni Tennison Consulting Ltd
• References: <8f.2263540f.2aba44ea@a...>
• Reply-to: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

Hi Andrew,

> Hasn't the img element been dropped from XHTML 2.0, at least as far
> as one can judge from the initial WD?
>
> Also, there is no mention of a longdesc attribute on the object
> element as far as I can trace in the WD.

If you want an XHTML 2.0 example, substitute img with area, src with
href, and longdesc with usemap:

<area>
  <href xlink:href="url_for_destination"/>
  <usemap xlink:href="url_for_image_map"/>
  ...
</area>

<object> also has four attributes that contain URIs that give links to
different kinds of resources.

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/

• References:
  • Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: strange feeling
• Next by Date: Re: strange feeling
• Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread