• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 16:56:47 -0400
• In-reply-to: <TRCASNWRXTXTQNWQB932XV41KHUSZVA5.3d29f711@MChamp>
• References: < <5.1.0.14.0.20020708150451.07140bc0@n...>

At 04:33 PM 7/8/2002 -0400, Mike Champion wrote:
>7/8/2002 3:17:01 PM, Jonathan Robie 
><jonathan.robie@d...> wrote:
>
> >You don't like our requirements. We are
> >required to meet them.
>
>Hmmm.  I see no statement to this effect, or indeed any mention of a
>mandatory requirements document, in 
>http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/
>
>A Last Call Working Draft must meet requirements set out in the charter,
>(XQuery's is still W3C confidential, I believe)
>and "any accompanying requirements documents" -- presumably meaning that the
>requirements document must be finalized by Last Call.

But as a W3C member, you could, of course, read this charter, and read what 
it has to say about XML Schema. With apologies to those who can not read 
it, because it is member-only, members can read it here:

http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/04/xmlquery-charter

Jonathan

• References:
  • Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Next by Date: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Previous by thread: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Next by thread: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread