• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 16:33:21 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020708150451.07140bc0@n...>

7/8/2002 3:17:01 PM, Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...> wrote:

>You don't like our requirements. We are 
>required to meet them.

Hmmm.  I see no statement to this effect, or indeed any mention of a 
mandatory requirements document, in http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/

A Last Call Working Draft must meet requirements set out in the charter,
(XQuery's is still W3C confidential, I believe) 
and "any accompanying requirements documents" -- presumably meaning that the
requirements document must be finalized by Last Call.

In my experience, a requirements document has the status of a working draft, and
can be changed by a working group as understanding of the circumstances changes.

Not that I labor under the illusion that changing the XQuery requirements is a feasible
option, but it is, strictly speaking, "legal."

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Next by Date: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Next by thread: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread