• To: distobj@a... (Mark Baker)
• Subject: Re: URIs harmful
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 08:00:20 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: tbray@t... (Tim Bray), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20020726080917.D10551@w...> from "Mark Baker" at Jul 26, 2002 08:09:17 AM

Mark Baker scripsit:

> Tim told me that he thought that http://www.w3.org/Consortium/
> identified the W3C.  

Well, okay.  But that URI also identifies a hyperdocument, so we haven't
really gained anything by moving off the home page: there is the same
old map/territory confusion.

-- 
John Cowan                                jcowan@r...
At times of peril or dubitation,          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Perform swift circular ambulation,        http://www.reutershealth.com
With loud and high-pitched ululation.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URIs harmful
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>
  • Re: URIs harmful
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• References:
  • Re: URIs harmful
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs harmful
• Next by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs harmful
• Next by thread: Re: URIs harmful
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread