• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: URIs harmful
• From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 09:10:14 -0400
• References: <200207261213.IAA23367@m...>

From: "John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>
> Mark Baker scripsit:
>
> > Tim told me that he thought that http://www.w3.org/Consortium/
> > identified the W3C.
>
> Well, okay.  But that URI also identifies a hyperdocument, so we haven't
> really gained anything by moving off the home page: there is the same
> old map/territory confusion.

If the above URI identified the W3C, then what gets returned via http is a
representation of the W3C.  This representation may be in the form of a
hyperdocument, but it is still only a representation.

Or are you saying that (not knowing of Tim's/Mark's statement) the above URI
could just as easily be identifying the resource that is the hyperdocument,
and not the W3C itself?

Seairth

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URIs harmful
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: URIs harmful
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by Date: RE: URIs harmful
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs harmful
• Next by thread: Re: URIs harmful
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread