• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: version numbers and infosets
• From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:21:46 -0400
• Cc: <xml-editor@w...>
• References: <200207231226.NAA21321@m...> <p04330100b963039b1e89@[192.168.254.4]> <004501c23252$f81d1dc0$32f5d90c@c1980223a> <006001c23255$3cd7a690$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k> <p04330105b963472c981a@[192.168.254.4]> <002301c23276$c2447030$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k> <p0433010bb963596ce1a4@[192.168.254.4]>

> However, it's not as if it's that hard to find a conforming 1.0 
> processor. Indeed, I strongly recommend that unless you expect to be 
> receiving documents in Amharic, Cambodian, Burmese you simply ignore 
> XML 1.1 and stay with XML 1.0.

This is true for me when I have my corporate developer hat on,
but it is a concern if I wear my parser developer hat.

Karl

• References:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Previous by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread