• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: version numbers and infosets
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:47:22 -0400
• Cc: xml-editor@w...
• References: <200207231226.NAA21321@m...><p04330100b963039b1e89@[192.168.254.4]><004501c23252$f81d1dc0$32f5d90c@c1980223a>

[Rafter]

> The de facto usage has been to fail on != 1.0. This represents a change--
> not a fix to an error-- the fact that the previous wording could not be
> reached through any production was perhaps a problem-- but the solution
> would be to make it reachable IMHO.
>

msxml3 fails on verson="1.1", I just tried it.  That is a big body of usage.
I don't know about msxml4.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs harmful
• Next by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Previous by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread