• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 15:17:02 +1000
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621DF5@r...> <200207191652.RAA29798@p...>

From: "David Carlisle" <davidc@n...>
 > > Or you could have postponed this errata to W3C XML Schema 1.1 which
> > hopefully would involve a namespace change. 
> 
> It may or may not have a change but why do you _hope_ for that.
> That's saying that if XML schema has any kind of revision, then the name
> of every schema construct should change.
> 
> Do you also hope that if there is an XML 1.1 that
> 
> <!ELEMENT and <!ATTLIST no longer work and XML 1.1 has different names
> for these constructs?
> 
> I see no difference between changing the namespace for W3C schema and
> saying that in XML 1.1 the syntax is now
> <!ELEMENT.1.1 or something.

But since it seems that most (all?) major XML processors will not accept 
documents labelled as XML 1.1, isn't the effect pretty similar to  renaming 
<!ELEMENT.

Cheers
Rick

• References:
  • RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
• Next by Date: Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• Previous by thread: Re: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• Next by thread: RE: Schema Namespace name, schemaLocation, and Schema V ersioning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread