• To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...>
• Subject: Re: What kind of trap is XPointer?
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: 18 Jul 2002 18:08:02 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <f5bsn2h2fkj.fsf@c...>
• References: <1027006408.23054.133.camel@ibook> <f5bsn2h2fkj.fsf@c...>

On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 17:58, Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> > Or have I missed something?
> 
> I think so -- I'm sorry if my previous message encouraged this
> misunderstanding.

Thanks for the clarification, this was absolutely not clear in the spec
and I think that the reason why a XML document may have "no PSVI" should
be clarified and that's much better as you state it!

Eric

-- 
See you in San Diego.
                               http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • What kind of trap is XPointer?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: What kind of trap is XPointer?
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Base (RE: Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
• Next by Date: Re: What kind of trap is XPointer?
• Previous by thread: Re: What kind of trap is XPointer?
• Next by thread: Re: What kind of trap is XPointer?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread