• To: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Subject: RE: Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
• From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:09:19 +0300
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcIn5D7MhqBWh663TTCa8u403UeJVQABFaFQ
• Thread-topic: Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)

> From: bryan [mailto:bry@i...] 

> Manos wrote:
> >About behaviors, that's not SVG; that's the predecessor named VML
> >(vector markup language ;-)
> 
> with binary behaviors, IE 5.5 and up you can use SVG inline on a
> webpage. Mr. Eisenberg can tell that story better than I for SVG
> however, as he wrote the book(SVG Essentials from O'Reilly) where I
> first learned you could use a binary behavior in that way. 

Thanks Bryan, I stand corrected. I am aware of binary behaviors since
they came out but had not heard of something like this before.

I abandoned (all) behaviors some time ago, since Behavioral extensions
to CSS where never supported by the industry in a consistent manner.

Regards,

Manos

• Prev by Date: RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheresome other standard that should be looked at
• Next by Date: Re: Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
• Previous by thread: Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
• Next by thread: RE: Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread