• To: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Subject: RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheresome other standard that should be looked at
• From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:02:19 +0300
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcIn5XHuFlQj+Nu7Rjms0i4NuSAQ5gAAfdLA
• Thread-topic: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheresome other standard that should be looked at

> From: bryan [mailto:bry@i...] 

> I was just wondering since I don't do as much with Mozilla as 
> I should,
> but if I remember correctly it's xlink implementation was all simple
> xlinks and didn't give any benefits beyond the basic html a link. Is
> that incorrect? 

Sorry, yup.


> If so can someone give me a succinct 
> description of the
> xlink benefits Mozilla has above simple linking?


Try this test page by Bob DuCharme.

http://www.snee.com/xml/xlink/sxlinkdemo.xml

Manos

• Prev by Date: RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheresome other standard that should be looked at
• Next by Date: RE: Browser support of XML standards (WAS: RE:Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to...)
• Previous by thread: RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead,istheresome other standard that should be looked at
• Next by thread: RE: text, regular expressions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread