• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: URIs harmful
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 21:12:56 -0400
• References: <001c01c234a4$be873c90$1fc8c8c8@mitchum>

[Bill de hÓra]


Tom,

> From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@c...]
>
> Yes, but the interpretations apply to sets of RDF triples,
> not to the URIs used to identify RDF resources.

Correct, though in doing so, each URI in the vocabulary (the URIs in the
graph) will come to denote only one thing.

[Tom P]
Bill,

Of course, those URIs are supposed to denote only one thing right from the
beginning, so it sounds like a way to get a consistency check...

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: URIs harmful
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs harmful
• Next by Date: Re: URIs harmful
• Previous by thread: RE: URIs harmful
• Next by thread: Re: URIs harmful
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread