• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: URIs harmful
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:02:44 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <001901c234a3$df89f870$fe193044@tbp1>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

Tom,

> From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@c...] 
>
> Yes, but the interpretations apply to sets of RDF triples, 
> not to the URIs used to identify RDF resources.

Correct, though in doing so, each URI in the vocabulary (the URIs in the
graph) will come to denote only one thing.
 

> This depends on what "sameness" means, of course - is that an 
> NP-hard question?

At least as hard as versioning is. There seems to be a need for it
nonetheless.

regards,
Bill de hÓra

..
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URIs harmful
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• References:
  • Re: URIs harmful
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs harmful
• Next by Date: Re: URIs harmful
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs harmful
• Next by thread: Re: URIs harmful
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread