• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: version numbers and infosets
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 13:42:51 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <006e01c23256$685ce590$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>From another post: What about documents intentionally designed
>to work under 1.1 *and* 1.0. What should their version number be?

1.0.  I'm not expecting there to be any 1.1-only xml systems in the
near future, if ever.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: version numbers and infosets
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XMLSpy 4.4 and use of URN: (was RE: URIs harmful (wasRE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark))
• Next by Date: Resolving Images
• Previous by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Next by thread: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread