• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XMLSpy 4.4 and use of URN: (was RE: URIs harmful (wasRE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark))
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 08:21:48 -0400
• References: <LOBBICBLDJIJHPNJFPOLGELPCJAA.mike@a...>

[Michael Leditschke]


> If I take your files and change all references
> to http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink in the schemas  to
> urn:..., XMLSpy and XSV validate the
> instance file ok.
>
> I'm probably missing something obvious, or have
> I misunderstood your concern?
>

My error (see previous post) - yes, now that you have the files validating
using "http://", change __all__ the xlink namespaces to start with "urn"
instead of "http://" and watch Spy fail to validate them.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • XMLSpy 4.4 and use of URN: (was RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark))
    • From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XMLSpy 4.4 and use of URN: (was RE: URIs harmful (wasRE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark))
• Next by Date: Re: version numbers and infosets
• Previous by thread: Re: XMLSpy 4.4 and use of URN: (was RE: URIs harmful (wasRE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark))
• Next by thread: RE: URIs harmful (was RE: Article: Keeping pa ce with James Clark)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread